Location |
Defendant(s) |
Date of Alleged Crime |
Churchill County, NV |
Harold Guyette |
Mar 12, 1966 |
Harold Chester
Guyette was
convicted of one count of murder after allegedly committing a double
homicide. On Mar. 12, 1966, Savin' Sam's, a mom-and-pop truck stop
between the towns of Fernley and Lovelock, was robbed. The operators,
Dean Briggs and his mother, Eva Briggs, were both fatally shot. After
being arrested for an outstanding traffic citation in his home state of
Indiana, Guyette, 20, was questioned about the double homicide in Nevada.
He admitted being in the area with his 17-year-old wife on a drive back from
California. His wife's stepfather had called Nevada authorities and
told them the two had been in the area. However, neither had been to
the location of the murders.
On the basis of
these statements, Guyette and his wife, Mary Lou, were extradited to Nevada.
The authorities made Mary Lou write letters to her husband, telling him to
confess so she could get out of jail. Guyette was denied legal
counsel. Eventually, Guyette did confess so Mary Lou could find
witnesses and help. Mary Lou did find witnesses and help, but Guyette
was convicted of murdering Dean Briggs. Witnesses placed Guyette and
his wife 197 miles away at the time of the murders. Guyette was released in
1972, officially on the technicality of being denied legal counsel. As
of 2008, Guyette is still fighting for official exoneration. (www.haroldguyette.com) (Google) [10/05] |
Churchill County, NV |
Broam & Manning |
Convicted 1990 (Fallon) |
Jack Ray
Broam, 38, and his co-worker, Jay Cee Manning, 37, were convicted of
sodomizing Broam's 9-year-old son, Neal. Both were sentenced to life
in prison. Neal testified that the two sexually
assaulted him as many as 50 times in one night. In 1998, the then
17-year-old Neal told a judge that his mother, Broam's ex-wife, locked him up
and starved him until he was willing to falsely testify against the two.
[10/05] |
Clark County, NV |
Emma Jo Johnson |
May 23, 1951 (Las Vegas) |
Emma Jo Johnson was
convicted of the murder of her 72-year-old landlady, Jane Jones.
Jones died in early June 1951 after apparently falling ill following a May
23 fracas with Johnson over mail. Johnson was released in Jan. 1954 after mystery writer Erle Stanley Gardner
(creator of Perry Mason) determined that Jones was not murdered as the
result of an asserted assault by Johnson, but instead died from a brain
tumor. (Google) [4/08] |
Clark County, NV |
Roberto Miranda |
1981 |
Roberto
Hernandez Miranda was convicted of murdering Manuel Rodriguez Torres and sentenced to
death. A witness claimed he drove with Miranda to Torres' house and waited
outside. The witness had motive to frame Miranda because Miranda was having
an affair with his girlfriend. An incompetent lawyer, Thomas Rigsby,
represented Miranda, and interviewed just three of the forty witnesses
relevant to the defense. Rigsby did not manage to serve a subpoena on a
single witness. Rigsby never brought out the fact that the accuser had
motive to frame Miranda or have witnesses testify who would verify his
innocence. In overturning the conviction, Miranda's appeals judge wrote,
"The lack of pretrial preparation by trial counsel...cannot be justified."
The prosecution subsequently dropped all charges and Miranda was later
awarded $5 million in compensation for 13 years on Nevada's death row.
[7/05] |
Clark County, NV |
Tabish & Murphy |
Sept 17, 1998 (Las Vegas) |
Rick Tabish, a trucking
contractor, and Sandy Murphy, a one-time topless dancer, were convicted in
2000 of murdering Murphy's boyfriend, Ted Binion. Binion, 55, was formerly
an executive of the Horseshoe Casino and had an estate worth $50 million.
Tabish and Murphy allegedly killed Binion by forcing him to swallow a
mixture of black tar heroin and the sedative Xanax. Murphy stood to inherit
about $1.5 million from Binion's estate. Tom Dillard, an investigator hired
by the Binion family, gathered evidence against the pair and got police to
file charges. Defense argued at trial that Binion was a well-known heroin
addict and had simply overdosed.
Binion
reportedly became depressed in March 1998 after the Nevada Casino Gaming
Control board permanently barred him from his family's casino because of his
reported drug use and his association with a known mobster. The day before
Binion's death, he was prescribed a month's supply of Xanax, which is useful
for combating the withdraw symptoms of heroin. However, it seemed unlikely
that he planned to use the Xanax for that purpose, for later that day, he
bought 12 balloons of black tar heroin from a drug dealer. Tabish and
Murphy's convictions were overturned in 2003 and the two were acquitted on
retrial in 2004. (L.A.
Times) (American Justice) [12/06] |
Clark County, NV |
David Ruffa |
Feb 7, 2002 (Henderson) |
David Ruffa
was convicted of murdering his estranged wife, Shao Lei. Pre-trial DNA
tests exonerated him and implicated an unknown person. Police and
prosecutors refused to pursue this result and request DNA samples from other
possible suspects. Instead they prosecuted Ruffa on the theory that he may
have accompanied or hired the hands-on killer. Even without the DNA
exoneration, the circumstantial case against Ruffa was weak and largely
refuted by defense evidence. However, Ruffa was convicted and sentenced to
life in prison. (TruthInJustice)
[3/07] |
Nye County, NV |
Shasta Roever |
Jan 17, 1993 (Pahrump) |
"Shasta"
Lerlene Evonne Roever was charged with murdering her live in fiancé, Ian Wilhite,
in part because Wilhite was shot with a .22 caliber bullet and she owned a
.22 caliber gun, although ballistics soon ruled out her gun. Wilhite had
moved to Pahrump from Las Vegas because his life had been threatened there.
At trial the key witness and main investigator lied on direct examination
and impeached their testimony on cross-examination. Throughout the trial,
this investigator fraternized with the jurors in the jurors lounge, not just
on the day he testified. His excuse was that it was the only smoking area
in the court building. Roever was convicted but the Nevada Supreme Court
overturned the conviction and noted, "There was no physical evidence to link
the defendant to the crime."
At the second
trial Roever insisted on testifying, but her public defender avoided or
refused to ask important questions regarding her husband's background and
associates. The subject was not even broached. Roever's public defender
refused to subpoena anyone on the two-page list of witnesses that she gave
him and even insulted her uncle, the only witness that was there for her.
This time the DA admitted there was no evidence, so he felt justified in
trying her based on whatever stories or opinions his witnesses could
fabricate about her.
As an example,
one witness testified that Roever had stated she had killed her own mother
and a baby. Roever had shared with this witness the story of the drowning
death of her mother and the story of the death of her child who was
asphyxiated during delivery by his own umbilical cord. Roever had an
ex-husband whom she had thrown out years before for lying and stealing;
his relatives were there to testify. The ex-husband's mother who once told
Roever she was in love with her fiancé (the murder victim) and wished he
would be interested in older women, told some tales that Roever hadn't a
clue about. Even though the jurors stated their concern about the lack of
evidence, Roever was convicted again. Later the Chief Deputy DA argued in
his response to the Nevada Supreme Court that ultimately, the truth behind
the stories is immaterial. In fact, he said, prosecutors assumed the
stories weren't true.
Roever has
repeatedly been offered plea bargains which would have allowed her to get
out years ago, so maintaining her conviction is a matter of pride for
prosecutors rather than a feeling that she must be locked up as a danger to
society. (JD02)
[6/05] |
Washoe County, NV |
Kriseya Labastida |
Jan 9, 1993 |
Kriseya
Labastida was
convicted of murder because her husband had physically abused her infant
son, Thunder, an abuse that resulted in his death. She was convicted
because she "should have known" that her husband was likely to abuse and
kill her son. The conviction was overturned in 2000. (IPT) |
|